AHRC Project 58 (also referred to as the "Coldicutt Report")

AFIA OVERVIEW

by Tim Renouf, Secretary AFIA - Aluminium Foil Insulation Association Inc. (Vic 1998)

and quotations by Prof. Richard Aynsley

March, 2003

 

 

Publication examined:

Thermal Performance of Housing Units in Queensland - Phase 1: a study by the Department of Architecture and Building, University of Melbourne. AHRC Report 58, 1981.

 

Research was funded by The Australian Housing Research Council (AHRC).

Research Team: A. Coldicutt (Team Leader), T. Isaacs, T. Williamson, S. Coldicutt, E. Coldicutt,

F. Moschini. The Project Committee included a member of CSIRO Division of Building Research.

 

The 1981 Australian Housing Research Council federally funded research report examined the thermal performance of ceiling insulation in housing units across Queensland. Four locations were selected: Brisbane, Rockhampton, Townsville, Longreach. Two types of ceiling insulation were compared:

(i) 75mm fibreglass directly on the ceiling, and

(ii) a single layer of reflective foil insulation across the top of ceiling joists with an airspace beneath.

 

The 275 page Report explicitly concluded that only foil insulation should be used. The central reason was that fibrous insulations had a greater resistance to heat flow up than foils, causing houses to stay hotter longer by trapping heat in the often difficult to ventilate ‘stagnant heat zone’ between the top of door heads and ceilings. Foil, on the other hand, stopped heat penetration successfully during the day and released accumulated heat beneath the ceiling during night time because of the foil’s inherently lower resistance to heat flow up compared to bulk insulation.

 

In warm to hot climates where winter heating is very low or non-existent, quoting Prof. Aynsley:  “Horizontal reflective foil airspaces in roofs have the unique characteristic of having a greater resistance to heat flow down than up. They act as one-way values for summer heat flow, restricting daytime heat gain while facilitating night time heat loss. This is important because indoor discomfort in the evening which inhibits sleep can be very debilitating". Houses using foil insulations combined with natural ventilation can readily avoid airconditioning.

 

Quoting Prof Aynsley again: "If energy efficiency regulations, as a matter of convenience, ignore the beneficial effects of horizontal reflective airspaces in roofs of houses in warm climates, then the situation could be actionable under trade practices legislation. Ignoring these effects would be detrimental to a wide range of aluminium foil insulation products and favour bulk insulation products in spite of the demonstrable consumer benefits of reflective insulation in Australia’s warm climates."

 

*****************

Quotations from:

Richard Aynsley, B.Arch (Hons I), MS (Arch Eng), PhD.

Member : ASHRAE

Former UNESCO Professor of Tropical Architecture, James Cook University, QLD

Dean, College of Technology, Southern Polytechnic State University, Marietta GA, USA

*August 2000

 

 

BENCHMARK CERTIFICATION
DESIGN DRAWINGS-1 DECLARED TOTAL R-VALUES
DESIGN DRAWINGS-2 DECLARED TOTAL R-VALUES
INSTALLATION INSTRUCTIONS
INSULATING ROOFS AND WALLS AND THE TRUTH ABOUT R-VALUES
INSULATION & BREATHING OF CLAD WALLS
SUMMER HEAT IS RADIANT HEAT - TESTING RESULTS IN CEILINGS
ENERGY EFFICIENT & HEALTHY HOUSE DESIGN - SUMMARY OF INSULATION CHOICES
PHYSICS OF HEAT FLOW & THERMAL AND BREATHING PERFORMANCE
INSULATION GUIDE 2001- HIA & GREENHOUSE OFFICE
FIBREGLASS & FOIL COMPARISON TESTING - QLD RESEARCH 1981
HISTORY OF HEAT TESTING - USA NATIONAL INSTITUTE STANDARDS & TECHNOLOGY